SPIEGEL Interview with Iran's President Ahmadinejad

[UzLand]

http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/spiegel/0,1518,druck-418660,00.html

Олдин Шпигель Ахмадинежодга савол беришни бошлади, кейин эса Ахмадинежод уларни саволга тута бошлади:) Куп жихатдан мантикий нарсаларни айтган.

[abcd]

http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/spiegel/0,1518,druck-418660,00.html

Олдин Шпигель Ахмадинежодга савол беришни бошлади, кейин эса Ахмадинежод уларни саволга тута бошлади:) Куп жихатдан мантикий нарсаларни айтган.
Nemislar Ahmadinajod orqali o'zini fikrlarini bildirvolishibdi.

[UzLand]

Nemislar Ahmadinajod orqali o'zini fikrlarini bildirvolishibdi.

Яхши фикр:) Качонгача Холокост буйича пул тулаймиз деб-а?:)

[Asadbek]

Яхши фикр:) Качонгача Холокост буйича пул тулаймиз деб-а?:)
Hali Germaniyaning yosh avlodi Holocaust dastidan ko'p "azob chekadi"...

Ahmadinijod rostdan ko'p mantiqiy fikrlar bildirgan. Bu suhbat bir muncha muddat oldin olingandi. Nazarimda, 10 kunlar oldin o'qigandim...

[UzLand]

Русчаси - http://www.inosmi.ru/print/227847.html

Айтгандай, inosmi.ru форумида бирота одам унга карши чикмади. Хаммага уни интервьюси екди.

[Black]

Eronni asl niyati nimaligi menga qorong'yu, lekin Ahmadihejadning ko'p fikrlari to'g'ri. Jurnalistlar qanchalik neprofessional tutib Eronni ayblashga harakat qilsa ham u o'zini yahshi tutdi va jurnalistlarni "og'zidan chiqqanini yoqasiga yopishtirdi". Yoki Ahmadihejad jurnalistlarni savollariga oldindan tayyorgarlik ko'rgan, yoki ko'tarlilgan masalalar bo'yicha haqiqatdan ham Eronni pozitsiyasi shunday.
Ishqilib urush bo'lmasinda. Eron ham o'z va'dasida turib atom bombani yaratmasa bo'lgani. Eron "Islom" davlati hisoblansada, agar atom bombaga ega bo'lsa qo'shni davlatlarga, jumladan Oz'b.ga ham tayziq o'tkazishi mumkin.

[zanjir]

Eronni asl niyati nimaligi menga qorong'yu, lekin Ahmadihejadning ko'p fikrlari to'g'ri. Jurnalistlar qanchalik neprofessional tutib Eronni ayblashga harakat qilsa ham u o'zini yahshi tutdi va jurnalistlarni "og'zidan chiqqanini yoqasiga yopishtirdi". Yoki Ahmadihejad jurnalistlarni savollariga oldindan tayyorgarlik ko'rgan, yoki ko'tarlilgan masalalar bo'yicha haqiqatdan ham Eronni pozitsiyasi shunday.
Ishqilib urush bo'lmasinda. Eron ham o'z va'dasida turib atom bombani yaratmasa bo'lgani. Eron "Islom" davlati hisoblansada, agar atom bombaga ega bo'lsa qo'shni davlatlarga, jumladan Oz'b.ga ham tayziq o'tkazishi mumkin.

agar osha davlat halifalikni davo qilsachi?

[Black]

agar osha davlat halifalikni davo qilsachi?

Zanjirbek , bu mavzuni ko'p cho'zib o'tirish niyatim yo'q. Sizga maslahatim oldin Shiyalar bilan Sunniylarni farqini tushinib oling (aqidaviy tarafdan), keyin tushunarsiz shiyalarni qanday "halifalik" tuzishni da'vo qilishini.

[Vector]

Ahmadinejad'ga qoyil qoldim lekin, xakikatni shundo oldide hammaga etvardi...

xamma etishga qorqan narsani u etvatti, usha arablayam(davlatlani nazarda tutvamman) qorqib etomi yurgan dardlani u yuzaga chiqarvatti...

gap yoq lekin shiya bosa ham

[Guardian]

The interview was hold on 30th, May of 2006. Ahmadnejad amazed me with his rather solid argument, logic and comments.

The Spiegel, German weekly magazine (!) said to be in the middle of left side, held interview with Iranian president. In the same time when Zionist propaganda machine are trying hard to manipulate the opinion of westerners, if not whole the world with exaggerated chaotic information against Iran. I personally think, Ahmadnejad is rather intellectual leader who has got passion for his country's future. But, I don't really understand if he is totally ruled by spiritual leader Khomeini, and expresses solely his leader's views. Whatever, I think Ahmadnejad is doing better then Bush or Tony Blair, foreign policy-wise. However, I don't argue with those who oppose him on internal policies he does at home, in Iran.

Here is the full interview. (http://www.spiegel.de/international/1,1518,418660,00.html) (Part I)

On the Holoaust.

Ahmadinejad: Well, then we have stirred up a very concrete discussion. We are posing two very clear questions. The first is: Did the Holocaust actually take place? You answer this question in the affirmative. So, the second question is: Whose fault was it? The answer to that has to be found in Europe and not in Palestine. It is perfectly clear: If the Holocaust took place in Europe, one also has to find the answer to it in Europe.

On the other hand, if the Holocaust didn't take place, why then did this regime of occupation ...



Ahmadinejad: We don't want to confirm or deny the Holocaust. We oppose every type of crime against any people. But we want to know whether this crime actually took place or not. If it did, then those who bear the responsibility for it have to be punished, and not the Palestinians. Why isn't research into a deed that occurred 60 years ago permitted? After all, other historical occurrences, some of which lie several thousand years in the past, are open to research, and even the governments support this.

On nuclear weapons:

Ahmadinejad: Allow me to encourage a discussion on the following question: How long do you think the world can be governed by the rhetoric of a handful of Western powers? Whenever they hold something against someone, they start spreading propaganda and lies, defamation and blackmail. How much longer can that go on?
...
You see, we conduct our discussions with you and the European governments on an entirely different, higher level. In our view, the legal system whereby a handful of countries force their will on the rest of the world is discriminatory and unstable. One-hundred and thirty-nine countries, including us, are members of the International Atomic Energy Authority (IAEA) in Vienna. Both the statutes of IAEA and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty as well as all security agreements grant the member countries the right to produce nuclear fuel for peaceful purposes. That is the legitimate legal right of any people. Beyond this, however, IAEA was also established to promote the disarmament of those powers that already possessed nuclear weapons. And now look at what's happening today: Iran has had an excellent cooperation with IAEA. We have had more than 2,000 inspections of our plants, and the inspectors have obtained more than 1,000 pages of documentation from us. Their cameras are installed in our nuclear centers. IAEA has emphasized in all its reports that there are no indications of any irregularities in Iran. That is one side of this matter.

...
But the other side is that there are a number of countries that possess both nuclear energy and nuclear weapons. They use their atomic weapons to threaten other peoples. And it is these powers who say that they are worried about Iran deviating from the path of peaceful use of atomic energy. We say that these powers are free to monitor us if they are worried. But what these powers say is that the Iranians must not complete the nuclear fuel cycle because deviation from peaceful use might then be possible. What we say is that these countries themselves have long deviated from peaceful usage. These powers have no right to talk to us in this manner. This order is unjust and unsustainable.

...
We're fundamentally opposed to the expansion of nuclear-weapons arsenals. This is why we have proposed the formation of an unbiased organization and the disarmament of the nuclear powers. We don't need any weapons. We're a civilized, cultured people, and our history shows that we have never attacked another country.
...

We stand by our statements because we're honest and act legally. We're no fraudsters. We only want to claim our legitimate right. Incidentally, I never threatened anyone - that, too, is part of the propaganda machine that you've got running against me.

When The Spiegel asked Ahmadnejad about Iran's threat to neighbouring countries:
Allow me to say two things. No people in the region are afraid of us. And no one should instill fear in these peoples. We believe that if the United States and these two or three European countries did not interfere, the peoples in this region would live peacefully together as they did in the thousands of years before. In 1980, it was also the nations of Europe and the United States that encouraged Saddam Hussein to attack us.

Another rather logically based argument was:
No, that's not what I meant. We think that they should just say who is to blame. They [American administration] should not use Sept. 11 as an excuse to launch a military attack against the Middle East. They should take those who are responsible for the attacks to court. We're not opposed to that; we condemned the attacks. We condemn any attack against innocent people.

Then we would accept that Palestinians are killed every day, that they die in terrorist attacks, and that houses are being destroyed. But let me say something about Iraq. We have always favored peace and security in the region. For eight years, the Western countries provided arms to Saddam in the war against us, including chemical weapons, and gave him political support. We were against Saddam and suffered severely because of him, so we're happy that he has been toppled. But we don't accept a whole country being swallowed under the pretext of wanting to topple Saddam. More than 100,000 Iraqis have lost their lives under the rule of the occupying forces. Fortunately, the Germans haven't been involved in this. We want security in Iraq.

Second part of the interview: (http://www.spiegel.de/international/0,1518,418660-2,00.html)


In addition, yesterday I read his interview on TIME magazine, where the reporter showed his great respect to Ahmadenajed. What do you think of Ahmadenajed's foreign policies? Please, share your views.

[Royal]

USda bogan shuncha interviewlardan va boshqa joylardagi interviewlardan korib, bemalol etsa boladi:

10 :0 Ahmedinijad hisobiga dip, soyosie muomalada juda zor odamakan lekin...

Malades...

[bacha]

Ahmadinejad should have been more polite from the beginning. You don't say "you will wipe-out Israel" from the map unless you are able to do it. Now he is trying to be polite. It is understandable that americans have taken that quote as the base of threat from nuclear Iran, and if not that quote, they would find another one. But, for a president, Ahmadinejad should have thought ten steps ahead, and know that in the world of disputes and argumentations to win public opinion, it will be much more harder to defend your own country and proove that it is a peaceful state after having promised to "wipe-out Zionist formation".

In general, iranians have very good strategy and foreign policy. Example, the recent behaviour of Ahmadinejad in the UN, and PR company to show Iran as a peaceful nation was a success. The sanctions are being repeatedly postponed, which is another victory of Iranian diplomacy and foreign policy. The only thing, never let that ugly man speak without having memorized notes of his own advisers.

[PinkPanter]

yes, yes, a very serious situation out there...

[Arhimed]

USda bogan shuncha interviewlardan va boshqa joylardagi interviewlardan korib, bemalol etsa boladi:

10 :0 Ahmedinijad hisobiga dip, soyosie muomalada juda zor odamakan lekin...

Malades...

yahshi siyosatchi yahshi spiker bo'lishi kerak menimcha, buni hayron qoladigan joyi yoq. Eroniylar gapga usta hamda ichidan pishgan boladi. Stalin lapasidan qanday qilib Janubiy Azerbayjonni ozlariga olib qolganlarini eslaysizlarmi?

[abcmoscow]

:D Thank you:D