PDA

View Full Version : Carmakers increasingly under fire for using run-flat tires


spoon
08-22-2007, 05:12 PM
http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/107975706c3761_02_runflat.jpg

Carmakers increasingly under fire for using run-flat tires

As the number of cars being equipped with run-flat tires increases car buyers are quickly learning that the new design is not all that it's cracked up to be. One automaker adamant in its decision to equip its cars with run-flats instead of installing a proper spare in the trunk is BMW, and it's now starting to experience a consumer backlash from that decision. Many of its customers are frustrated, not only at the shortcomings of the tire itself but also because of the exorbitant bill they face once the tires need to be replaced. Note that many service centers are unable to fix run-flats, and you can forget about re-treads (though that's probably a good thing).

Apart from the high cost of replacing the tires, run-flats are harder to come by and they don't last as long as regular tires either. Though the idea of not having to worry about changing the tire if it gets punctured sounds great, run-flats only have a range of about 50 to 100 miles once the rubber is damaged. Not much solace if you happen to hit a spike in the middle of nowhere.

Along with BMW, Corvette also has run-flats, and Toyota and Honda put them on some minivans.

Apparently, run-flats were introduced because consumers want "the smallest amount of hassle in their lives," according to an engineer from Bridgestone. Perhaps it's time drivers were forced to learn how to change a tire as part of their licensing tests.

spoon
08-22-2007, 05:17 PM
Personally, I am against having the run-flat tires. It makes it worse when you're actually driving on some ruts and rough roads.

Masud
09-05-2007, 10:31 AM
Being in a tire dealer business. Run-on-flats are not so bad. They are very expensive to replace.

There was a Corvette in our shop, it had run flat, we were able to fix it. Bridgestone came up with EMT tire, however, it has extra pieces which makes it non-repairable.

Another important fact about Porsche Cayenne, it does not have a spare tire.

Run-on-flat tyres are still in developmental stage, so when there is more engineering put into them, then they may turn-out to be useful for consumers.

Royal
09-05-2007, 01:06 PM
http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/08/107975706c3761_02_runflat.jpg

Carmakers increasingly under fire for using run-flat tires

As the number of cars being equipped with run-flat tires increases car buyers are quickly learning that the new design is not all that it's cracked up to be. One automaker adamant in its decision to equip its cars with run-flats instead of installing a proper spare in the trunk is BMW, and it's now starting to experience a consumer backlash from that decision. Many of its customers are frustrated, not only at the shortcomings of the tire itself but also because of the exorbitant bill they face once the tires need to be replaced. Note that many service centers are unable to fix run-flats, and you can forget about re-treads (though that's probably a good thing).

Apart from the high cost of replacing the tires, run-flats are harder to come by and they don't last as long as regular tires either. Though the idea of not having to worry about changing the tire if it gets punctured sounds great, run-flats only have a range of about 50 to 100 miles once the rubber is damaged. Not much solace if you happen to hit a spike in the middle of nowhere.

Along with BMW, Corvette also has run-flats, and Toyota and Honda put them on some minivans.

Apparently, run-flats were introduced because consumers want "the smallest amount of hassle in their lives," according to an engineer from Bridgestone. Perhaps it's time drivers were forced to learn how to change a tire as part of their licensing tests.
Micheline, Bridgestone and some Chinese tyre manufacturers develop such a tyre, but still no market yet...