A Funny poem, in Tehrani Azeri, maybe you understa

[Iranyar]

let's see how much you understand it, it is a funny poem in Azeri, from Tehran.

P.S in one verse there is a so called Poetical necissitym by which the grammar may look wrong in order to adjust the "weight"of the poem.


Mдn bir danд hдmmalдm
Дhlм shдhrм Xдlxalдm

Mдkanдm Sдbzд Meydan
nд kot (coat) varдm nд tonban.

(Shaer= an arrogant Tehrani guy ;) )

let's see how much you can translate.

[Mrs. Pachino]

mda :)

[Kroka]

Enusik perevedi plz :)

[sean]

I liked it so much :) but
The classical economists Adam Smith and David Ricardo mostly focused on three major points in their approach to developing a theory of value. First, they thought it necessary to start their analysis of economy with the question of value. Second, they tried to find out how the terms of production were linked the value of labor. The terms of production were mainly mining or factory work, but not the marketplace where goods acquired their particular values. Third, they tried to find the subsistence theory of wages and the cost of labor, which were themselves equal to the value of the goods and services that a working class needed in order to live. Smith basically reformulated the economic theory of his time, and Ricardo reformulated Smith. For instance Adam Smith's central point was that the economic prosperity of each individual is the well being of the nation. The price of products is determined by the supply and demand, but not by the cost of the production.1 Ricardo, on the other hand, Smith's successor and his critic, argued that the rise of the wealth of the capitalists will result in the loss of the wealth of the workers. This paper will investigate similarities and differences between their definitions of value. Smith offered two ways of calculating the value of product in terms of labor 2. Ricardo disagreed with Smith's second method, which offered a non-scientific approach. The standpoint of the two scholars is better clarified when we look into their interpretation of value.


mda, thank u I think it was a good annotation to your poem, I liked it anyway:)

[Iranyar]

David Ricardo is a stupid moron.

[Iranyar]

65: ice at -10 and steam at 130 are brought together at atmospherric pressure in a
perfectly insulated container. After thermal equilibrium is reached the liqud phase at 50 is
present. ignoring the container and the equilbrium vapor pressure of liquid is at 50. find
the ratio of mass of steam to mass of ice.


and temp are in celsius (but this doesn't matter)!!

[sean]

but it does make sence, just go deeper

[Iranyar]

We are not as autonomous as we think, we could be rational, but our rationality doesn't determine our success.Not allways bad consequences are a result of the ones own actions.

There is really such a darvinstic concepts of Survival of the fittest, the weak usually are getting victim or at least dependent of the strongers benefits.

and Luck is also important, you should chose the right actions but in order to reach an optimal result you should have luck too.
Machiavelli said: Virtu et Fortuna, I think he was right Fortuna is important too.

[iroda ahmedova]

I beleive in luck as well as hard work. This has been in debates a lot. But, for me hard work comes first and luck next. Different nationalities have different ways for having luck.English/Americans keep fingers crossed, Africans put thumbs together. It was strange when I discussed it with sb that Uzbek people just keep praying while waiting for the best of luck. We think it's from God, but western people here don't understand it very often.It's a bit strange,isn't? We are not as autonomous as we think, we could be rational, but our rationality doesn't determine our success.Not allways bad consequences are a result of the ones own actions.

There is really such a darvinstic concepts of Survival of the fittest, the weak usually are getting victim or at least dependent of the strongers benefits.

and Luck is also important, you should chose the right actions but in order to reach an optimal result you should have luck too.
Machiavelli said: Virtu et Fortuna, I think he was right Fortuna is important too.