PDA

View Full Version : UDP Poll (ovoz bering)


sherzodr
07-16-2001, 12:31 PM
http://sherzodr.umid.uz/cgi-bin/poll.cgi


rahmat


P.S. Use the link provided in the below post since the above copy of the Poll doesn't work because of the bug in CGI.pm 3.02.

sherzodr
07-16-2001, 02:29 PM
Anyone had problems with the poll?
I now BuBu got an XML error :(

If that's the case, check this out:
http://sherzodR.umid.uz/cgi-bin/poll1.cgi

Komsomolec
07-17-2001, 09:37 AM
Lichno mne kazhetsya chto vy, rebyata, samaya poslednyaya nadezhda na to, chto nash rodnoy Uzbekistan stanet progresssivnym, civilizovannym obshestvom v obozrimom budushem. I eto ne prosto slova, esli nado, ya mogu konkretno obosnovat' pochemu vy i pochemu "poslednyaya".
President Karimov dal nachalo UMIDu i ochen hochetsya nadeyatsya, chto teper on dast vozmozhnost' UMIDovcam vzrostit' noviy, politicheskiy institut, sposobniy ostavit' "zhestkie razborki" otcovskih pokoleniy v proshlom.
Esli Gospodin President ne popytaetsya ispol'zovat' UMID v svoih tekushih politicheskih celyah, a pozvolit poyavleniyu novogo progressivnogo dvizheniya, sposobnogo vesti obshestvo vpered, to on bezuslovno zasluzhil by za eto istoricheskoe priznanie pered Uzbekistanom.
Prichem vse eto delo ne dalyokogo budushego, vremya trebuet bezotlagatel'nyh deystviy, a inache mozhno "prospat'"
Udachi!

guest
07-17-2001, 10:15 AM
Sherzod ,

Uyat emasmi, "Boshlanishini koriy"... Nima digani bu? Agar partiya asosi shunaqa hatolar bilan boshlanadigan bo'lsa, bunaqada bilmadim partiyani o'zi qanaqa bo'larakan.

Ochiq tanqiddan hafa bo'lmassiz digan umiddaman.

Omad.

sherzodr
07-17-2001, 10:33 AM
guest (Jul 17, 2001 10:15):
Sherzod ,

Uyat emasmi, "Boshlanishini koriy"... Nima digani bu? Agar partiya asosi shunaqa hatolar bilan boshlanadigan bo'lsa, bunaqada bilmadim partiyani o'zi qanaqa bo'larakan.

Ochiq tanqiddan hafa bo'lmassiz digan umiddaman.

Omad.
Nimasini xato divotsiz?
Agar ishlatilgan tilni xato divotgan bo'sez, qo'shilaman, siyosiy lahja emas. Siyosiy lahja ko'pchiligimizga juda ham zerikarli, o'shanga o'zimizni kundalik lahjani tanladim.

Agar mantiqan xato qo'yilgan savol disez, qarshiligim yo'q. Ishdan charchab xom kallaga qilgan ishim; maslahat uchun ham o'shanda odam topolmagandim :(

Agar birga ishlasak, bundan keyingi ishlarimiz ancha xatolarga kam bo'ladi

sherzodr
07-18-2001, 11:28 PM
QOp ketmasin pastda didimde :-)

hazratqul
07-19-2001, 12:54 AM
Мен бу анкета сурокларини абсолют нормал ва тугри куйилган деб уйлайман. Bravo SerzodR!

Бу дунёдаги хамма нарсани яна хам гузал ва оптималрок, яхширок, баккуватрок ва хоказо килиш мумкин. Лекин уларнинг ичида энг зури бу АМАЛИЙси!

referee
07-19-2001, 01:49 PM
a small constructively critical comment:

A party should have a charter with its clear aims and the outlined methods it wants to achieve them ,and around those very objectives people usually establish a party. As i can see with UDP, it is the opposite - some ambitious (positive remark!) Umidies want to form some sort of 'club' from similar backgrounded people with broad feeling of patriotism to Uzb.

The idea sounds good, since Uzb truely needs civil society at this hard time. But unless those people form the party (UDP) with clear objectives and achieve consensus on how to accomplish them, the idea will become either a 'noble dream' or another way for some Umidies to grasp favourable social positions in Uzb.....

Komsomolec
08-06-2001, 12:22 PM
I VSE CHTO-LI?

sherzodr
08-06-2001, 11:19 PM
No, can't be :(

MegaZ
08-07-2001, 01:47 AM
SherzodR: I've updated CGI.pm to the latest 3.03...
But, isn't it in alpha state right now ?

sherzodr
08-07-2001, 02:37 AM
Not fixed :(. CGI3.03_1 says it's alpha, you're right.

Stable version comes with it's own new namespace now ( I don't know why ??? ). It is CGI3 not CGI. I skimmed through the docs, looks like the same as the one for CGI 2.x series ( http://www.ultracgis.com/CGI3.html ).. and the README says :This is a plug-in replacement for the CGI module which contains
numerous and extensive performance enhancements contributed by David James (david@jamesgang.com).

It is based in CGI.pm version 2.60.
The reason why I thought it was a bug in CGI was the fact the problem occured after the update, both on forum and on the poll.cgi. poll1.cgi works 'coz I avoided CGI.pm to some extent.

sherzodr
08-07-2001, 04:09 AM
MegaZ, I tested them and CGI3 returns the same error as CGI.3x series do ??? So the problem will not be solved with CGI3 either, I guess.

But with CGI.2x series it works without a problem (here I am talking about poll.cgi)...

So there's still an unresolved bug in CGI3 (since L. Stein promised backward compatibility in the further releases). Now I am not sure if the problem with forum is because of CGI.pm or Forum itself ??? To find out just return CGI.pm 2.74 and see if it solves the problem

MegaX
08-07-2001, 06:02 AM
OK, downgraded to 2.76
Hope there won't be anymore problems ;-)

sherzodr
08-07-2001, 07:02 AM
endi hammasi ishlavotti (modify profile ham ishlamavotudi.. xozir ishlavotti). Kewl ;-)